This message from Saurab was originally posted on the email list J_Krishnamurti, and thank you very much,  Saurab.


K wrote the following in one of his books:

“It was not the quietness of exhaustion, or of relaxation, but a stillness that was very alert. There was no point from which the mind was still; there was no observer of this tranquillity; the experiencer was wholly absent.”

Now, if the experiencer was wholly absent, how could K talk about it later ? The recording of the experience must have taken place with reference to an entity who could later recall what was recorded…. But when K says that the experiencer was wholly absent, it does not make sense to me…..


Comment by Wry:   It might be worthwhile to inquire into what the “experiencer” who was reading those words was experiencing,  to look carefully at the dynamic of creating a really vivid experience,  even what what some might call (and K sometimes did use this word),   a “sacred” experience, through the use of imagery and making inaccurate correlations,  The poetry of his language in conjunction with a  distortion of physical reality was obviously in some way effective in attracting and deeply resonating with many readers,  myself at one time very much included.  Illusion (and delusion:-) can be very alluring and seductive.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: