In earlier writings, I explored several questions surrounding David Bohm’s reservations about Krishnamurti’s teachings, including the broader issue of obscurity within the material and the difficulty of clarifying it. What follows revisits and draws together some of those earlier observations, while turning to a more specific question: what Bohm may have meant by a lack …

Continue reading

Wry wrote (on November 16th): Niko wrote: “In an earlier post on this blog, I talked about David Bohm’s doubts concerning the ultimate usefulness of Krishnamurti’s teachings.” This may be kind of dark, though it could be said that in order to see the light there must be contrast. Anyway, just musing, it occurs to …

Continue reading

I have personally participated in a few different Krishnamurti based discussion groups over the years.  From my perspective, any insights garnered from participation in these groups have happened by critiquing K as opposed to agreeing with him or defending him.  As I wrote in the introductory statement for this blog, there is something missing from …

Continue reading

In an earlier post on this blog, I talked about David Bohm’s doubts concerning the ultimate usefulness of Krishnamurti’s teachings.  In his book about the Oak Grove School, David Moody recounts a conversation with David Bohm in which Bohm states that Krishnamurti’s work lacked a “fine focus” in its depiction of the nuances of consciousness.  …

Continue reading